26 February 2020 -CfMP urges Infrastructure Australia ‘lift gaze’ beyond Frankston
The Committee for Mornington Peninsula (CfMP) is disappointed that the priority list released by Infrastructure Australia (IA) today doesn’t
include a commitment for any infrastructure projects for the Mornington Peninsula.
IA have proposed an ‘initiative’ for public transport connectivity improvements to, and through, Frankston, with a view that these
improvements should support major redevelopments to the east of Frankston. Elements identified by IA for such an initiative, include:
- optimising the existing bus network
- increasing bus service frequency and coverage
upgrades to rail services and infrastructure.
The CfMP is urging IA to ‘life its gaze’ beyond the east of Frankston in relation to transport requirements to consider the needs of the
Mornington Peninsula and explore the staged electrification of the rail line beyond Frankston along the Stony Point line and freight rail
connections to Cranbourne line.
President of CfMP, the Hon Bruce Billson emphasised the significant public transport and infrastructure challenges faced by the Mornington
“Our region has the lowest access to public transport facilities within metropolitan Melbourne, and this raises the question again about
whether policy makers and transport planners even consider the Mornington Peninsula to be part of the metropolitan Melbourne”, Mr Billson
“This impacts our community by inhibiting access to educational services, jobs and visitor connections to the region.
“The recent CfMP study on available land for local employment creation examined journey to work data and found that 45% of Mornington
Peninsula residents with a job leave the Peninsula, some commuting significant distances, to their place of employment.
“Improving this employment ‘self containment’ with more local livelihood opportunities must be complemented by improved transport options
and linkages for those forced to leave the Peninsula for work.
“This must involve IA lifting its gaze beyond the east of Frankston in relation to transport requirements to consider the needs of the
Mornington Peninsula, and this will be the CfMP focus as the process moves into the “initiative identification and options development’
phase”, Mr Billson said.
Mr Billson added that the release of the Commonwealth-funded ‘business case’ undertaken by the State Government into extended the Frankston
line electrification to Baxter would provide key insights and analysis on the best next steps for improving rails services for the
As outlined in by the recent “Better Buses” campaign by the Mornington Peninsula Shire:
- 82% of the Peninsula is not serviced by public transport.
The Shire has the second lowest provision of public transport out of the 31 councils in the
Melbourne metropolitan area.
2 out of 3 major activity centres on the Peninsula are not serviced by rail; the third has a
diesel service on a limited timetable.
The lack of public transport options impacts on the community in different ways according to
their needs and stages of life (e.g. young, elderly, people with disabilities);
Due to the lack of public transport on the Peninsula, our residents are almost six times less
likely to travel to work by public transport than Greater Melbourne;
A mere 3% of Shire residents take public transport to work, compared with 15% across
Aside from public transport, the CfMP have identified a number of infrastructure needs in their Strategic Plan for the region including:
Development of infrastructure to enable Class A recycled water to be affordably available to support the region’s agricultural production
A need for re-examination of Government policy to support the considered development of the Port of Hastings & reduce potential Port
A need to improve poor broadband & mobile services
The Infrastructure Australia 2020 priority list also identified improved capacity in east coast deep
water container port facilities as a national priority.
Mr Billson said CfMP hoped this national priority identification would prompt a ‘serious, sober and sensible rethink’ about future plans for
Western Port as a significant freight hub.